The parser was unconditionally scanning things which it thought
were conditional/enum lists (or tag arg lists) when they couldn't
possibly be (i.e < inside a param which should be valid).
This change fixes it (i.e %?and(%if(%pv, <, -50), %if(%mp, >i, 1))
is perfectly valid now.
This *may* break your exsiting skins if you were using %if with < or >
Change-Id: Ia24dbdf0b11fc7d8a735c1111d648c3bebd68ac6
This reverts commit ec8b21eef8 which was pushed by accident.
Change-Id: I1aaedf6876d0448a100dc582b79f1293d021bac1
Reviewed-on: http://gerrit.rockbox.org/216
Reviewed-by: Thomas Martitz <kugel@rockbox.org>
The parser was unconditionally scanning things which it thought
were conditional/enum lists (or tag arg lists) when they couldn't
possibly be (i.e < inside a param which should be valid).
This change fixes it (i.e %?and(%if(%pv, <, -50), %if(%mp, > 1))
is perfectly valid now.
This *may* break your exsiting skins if you were using %if with < or >
Change-Id: Ibcb42bc6bb78908f79de024b61276b91b1ce02a0
Reviewed-on: http://gerrit.rockbox.org/214
Reviewed-by: Thomas Martitz <kugel@rockbox.org>
