From 74dd276fe16ecd3de46d866e631273f286fbf7f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Solomon Peachy <pizza@shaftnet.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 21:52:11 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] debug:  Wrap rb_backtrace with HAVE_RB_BACKTRACE instead of
 CPU_ARM

Basically, preparation for a non-ARM backtrace support.

Change-Id: Icfd09fbc65a98f859e2a19f8d1111827a262a969
---
 firmware/export/system.h | 5 +++++
 firmware/panic.c         | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/firmware/export/system.h b/firmware/export/system.h
index f26b3d7f56..ebeef9c004 100644
--- a/firmware/export/system.h
+++ b/firmware/export/system.h
@@ -253,6 +253,11 @@ static inline void cpu_boost_unlock(void)
     #define MIN_STACK_ALIGN 8
 #endif
 
+/* Define this if target has support for generating backtraces */
+#ifdef CPU_ARM
+    #define HAVE_RB_BACKTRACE
+#endif
+
 #ifndef MIN_STACK_ALIGN
 #define MIN_STACK_ALIGN (sizeof (uintptr_t))
 #endif
diff --git a/firmware/panic.c b/firmware/panic.c
index 7e7e43d609..90e727d5e4 100644
--- a/firmware/panic.c
+++ b/firmware/panic.c
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ void panicf( const char *fmt, ...)
         }
     }
 
-#if defined(CPU_ARM)
+#if defined(HAVE_RB_BACKTRACE)
     rb_backtrace(pc, sp, &y);
 #endif
 #ifdef ROCKBOX_HAS_LOGF